My parent attended the Emergency Department at FSH over the weekend for an issue relating to their neck.
During my parent's stay, they were put on a drip & sent for an ultrasound.
My parent informed me that they were sent to the x-ray room, & was correctly identified, but then asked to remove their shoe & sock for scanning of their ankle, despite repeatedly saying that the problem was with their neck.
When my parent was discharged from ED, they returned home with the IV cannula still in situ. My parent removed it, however was unaware of the amount or duration of compression required to stop the bleeding, which they found quite alarming.
I am sure that departments such as this get incredibly busy, & I am sure staff were doing their best. However I find the lack of attention to detail concerning, particularly with the risk of infection from cannulation & the subsequent health issues that may have arisen. Importantly, these incidents relate to Standard 2 (Partnering with Consumers) & Standard 3 (Preventing & Controlling Healthcare Acquired Infections) of the National Safety & Quality Health Service Standards, so I feel that they should be addressed to prevent confusion, or harm to, future patients.
"Care in the Emergency Department"
About: Fiona Stanley Hospital Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch 6150
Posted by Caspian (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference ››
Responses
See more responses from Neil Doverty