Text size

Theme

Language

"Admission to health service"

About: Subiaco Community Mental Health

(as a carer),

My relative suffers from severe and enduring schizophrenia. They live independently in the community, with clinical care provided by the Subiaco Adult Community Mental Health Clinic (SACMHC) . They are "Case Managed” by an Occupational Therapist who I feel lacks empathy, seemingly has limited clinical knowledge and expertise, and apparently has little knowledge of the mental health service system. My relative’s 'Psychosocial Support' is provided by an NDIS service provider with, to my knowledge, unqualified unskilled workers who seem to have little or no knowledge or understanding of mental illness or the recovery model of care.

The above has had a significant negative impact on my relative’s condition and quality of life. Their condition has deteriorated significantly, and as a result, they hav repeatedly for months requested voluntary admission to the Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital Mental Unit.

I believe these requests have fallen on deaf ears until several weeks ago when the psychiatrist at SACMHC agreed to refer them for hospital admission. Two weeks ago, my relative contacted SACMHC to enquire about their position on the hospital waitlist and was told by the Duty Clinician that they were second. At that time, their case manager had been on leave for 3 weeks without being replaced.

Recently I tried to contact the case manager to advocate for my relative’s admission.. The case manager did not return my call but subsequently phoned my relative to tell them a bed had become available at Graylands hospital.

My relative has repeatedly stated that they do not feel safe at Graylands hospital, has specifically and repeatedly requested to be admitted to another hospital and was prepared to be waitlisted. However, the CM urged them to take the bed offered, saying they had less than an hour to make a decision, and if they declined they would be sent to the bottom of the waitlist. I understand the CM told my relative this advice was from the ]Bed Manager], added that it was a nice ward, and that this was the only bed they would be offered.

I believe my relative was clearly distressed and conflicted at being pressured to take the offer. I offered to advocate on their behalf and called the CM to seek more information. The CM was unable to answer my questions regarding the acuity of the patients at the proposed unit, the unit bed configuration, aces to outdoors , and etc.

I believe they repeatedly gave me false and misleading information which I feel was tantamount to coercion and consistently contradicted their own information. They then directed me to call Graylands.

When I called Graylands hospital the switchboard operator informed me it was the CMs role to find out the information I requested but put me through to the ward regardless. The ward phone was answered by a person who only provided their first name.. I was unable to identify if I had the correct ward or to whom who I was speaking. I asked to speak to who was in charge and again someone answered the phone only giving their first name and no identifying information. This individual briefly answered my questions, but throughout our conversation repeatedly stated that they were busy doing something else and added that my questions would be answered once my relative was admitted. They also said they knew who I was !

I relayed the information given to me to my relative, and they refused the bed.

I am (again) amazed, dismayed and disappointed in the apparent lack of professionalism I have witnessed in the WA mental health service. I believe the Case Manager used coercion to convince my relative and myself to agree with them – and not for the first time to my knowledge. They provided what I believe to be false and misleading information to a vulnerable individual and their Carer, and seemed unaware of my relatives deteriorating condition.

Previous meetings between my relative, myself and the CM resulted in agreed case management plans that have never been implemented.. The CM is often unable to answer my queries, and they appear to have little knowledge of mental health services and the NDIS/ mental health interface. I believe this CM lacks in knowledge, skills, understanding and empathy to effectively help my relative, and others with mental illnesses.

While the mental health system in WA continues to place Occupational Therapists and Social Workers in Case Management positions, and rely on the NDIS to provide mental health care, I believe the quality of care will continue to decline, the rate of hospital admissions will continue to climb, and vulnerable people will continue to suffer.

I feel the case manager has proved to be unprofessional, unreliable and untrustworthy. This combination has done my relative immeasurable harm, and I shudder to think of how many other people are in the same situation.

I believe that until recommendations from the Chief Psychiatrist’s Review Building rehabilitation and recovery services for people with severe enduring mental illness and complex needs - including those with challenging behaviour (2020) are actualised it seems to me that the mental system in WA will continue to fail its most vulnerable clients and their carers.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Theresa Marshall, Executive Director, Mental Health, Public Health and Dental Services, North Metropolitan Health Service 2 days ago
Theresa Marshall
Executive Director, Mental Health, Public Health and Dental Services,
North Metropolitan Health Service
Submitted on 13/06/2025 at 10:38 AM
Published on Care Opinion Australia at 10:38 AM


Dear februaryjm78,

Thank you for taking the time to share with us the experience that you and your relative have had with the Subiaco Community Mental Health Services (CMHS) clinic and admission to inpatient mental health services. We are sincerely sorry for the distress caused to both you and your relative as a result of the care and information that was provided. It sounds as though the information that has been provided to you has been unclear and confusing which is a terrible additional difficulty for you to deal with while you are already worried for the mental health state of your relative.

I can understand the range of services involved in your relative’s care, some of which are beyond our control, adds to your stress and frustration in supporting and advocating for them.

For background information the Subiaco CMHS and Graylands Hospital (GH) are operated by the WA Government. The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is federally-funded and delivered by independent service providers, so we cannot comment on the qualifications of NDIS support staff. Subiaco CMHS Case Managers do not determine the selection of the NDIS service provider who delivers care to a participant; this is sole remit of the consumer to choose a service to suit their needs.

I am sorry to hear about your contact with the case manager at CMHS, and the information you were given regarding care at GH. This must have been very distressing particularly given your follow up call to GH.

The staff within CMHS have health care backgrounds and qualifications constituting multi-disciplinary teams who specialise in mental health care and treatment. All but one of the Occupational Therapy staff at Subiaco CMHS are senior staff whose clinical backgrounds are suitable for case management roles.

For your information CMHS clinics can refer consumers for inpatient treatment, the patient must still proceed through a triage process to determine the urgency of their care. When a person is assessed as needing longer term care, they are allocated a bed at either the SCGH MHU or GH. Determining which of these hospitals a patient will be cared for involves many considerations including:

- whether they are an involuntary or voluntary patient;

- their level of acuity and needs, relative to the services available at each location;

- bed availability and the impact that other patients may have given their mental health state and presentation.

Of primary concern always are the needs of each of the patients. However, based on resourcing, availability of beds and staffing levels, the needs of a patient must be considered relative to the needs of other patients requiring care. Whilst we consider the patient and their family’s requests, it is not always possible to provide an inpatient bed at the patient’s preferred hospital.

When a patient declines an available bed, there is a waitlist for the next available bed. When a bed becomes available, placement must then be considered relative to the factors above, which can take some time. This is likely why the Case Manager may have encouraged your relative to accept the available bed at GH.

I will ensure your feedback is passed on to educate the relevant team about how we can better support our patients and carers. It is difficult for us to respond to the concerns about the Case Manager’s behaviour and the lack of implementation of a consumer management plan, without further detail. We encourage you to submit further information for our investigation to the NMHS MHS Consumer Liaison Services on 9242 9612 or via email at mhsdhs.cls@health.wa.gov.au. You may also contact the Subiaco CMHS Service Coordinator on (08) 9489 7200 to further discuss your concerns.

Once again, I am very sorry for the challenges you have experienced and assure you that we are committed to helping you and your relative to secure the care and treatment that they need.

Thank you for your feedback and I hope that this assists you.

Kind regards

Theresa Marshall

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k