Text size

Theme

Language

"Concerning experience and lack of monitoring"

About: Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital / Emergency Department

(as a relative),

To the SCGH Patient Safety Team,

I am writing to share a distressing experience my parent had at the SCGH Emergency Department shortly before New Year. While we encountered some wonderful individuals, the systemic gaps in my parent's care have left us too anxious to return to this facility in the future.

My parent was brought in by ambulance for chest pain. Although the initial ECG was clear, a cardiac event had not yet been ruled out, and they were sent to the ED as a precaution.

Concerns regarding bed placement and monitoring

Upon triage, my parent was placed in a bed at the very end of the ward, completely out of the line of sight of the nursing station and adjacent to the toilets. They remained there for over 30 minutes without a single staff member checking on them. We feel this was a significant clinical risk; if my parent had suffered a cardiac event during that window, they were positioned where I believe no one would have seen or heard them.

The bathroom incident

The most upsetting part of the night occurred when a staff member assisted my parent to the patient toilet but did not wait for them. My parent struggled with a faulty or "funny" lock and found themself trapped. Without their phone and panicking, they began banging on the door and screaming for help. No one responded.

Eventually, my parent managed to force the door open themself. They was deeply distressed, and we are concerned that the physical and emotional stress of being trapped could have triggered a serious event had their condition been cardiac-related.

Summary of seemingly sub-standard care:

Inappropriate Triage/Placement: I believe that a patient with "unruled-out" chest pain should not be placed in an unmonitored "blind spot" of the ED.

Lack of Supervision: Given their symptoms, I believe they should not have been left unattended in a bathroom.

Safety Hazards: The lock on that specific toilet door appears to be faulty or difficult to operate, posing a risk to vulnerable patients.

The "Silver Lining"

I do want to mention that the Irish doctor on duty (I unfortunately didn't catch her name) was absolutely lovely. She was attentive, professional, and was one of the only reasons my parent felt heard that night. We were also relieved that cardiac issues were eventually ruled out and the pain was attributed to a strained muscle.

Conclusion

Despite the kindness of that doctor, the overall experience felt like my parent was "just another number." The realization that this apparent lack of monitoring could have, in my opinion, been fatal has broken our trust in SCGH. We will likely seek care at a different hospital in the future, which is a shame given the many good people who work there.

I hope this feedback helps improve the protocols for monitoring chest pain patients and leads to a check on the maintenance of the bathroom locks.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Jodi Graham, Executive Director, SCGOPHCG, North Metropolitan Health Service 3 months ago
Jodi Graham
Executive Director, SCGOPHCG,
North Metropolitan Health Service
Submitted on 23/03/2026 at 6:44 PM
Published on Care Opinion Australia on 24/03/2026 at 10:55 AM


picture of Jodi Graham

Dear Earlybird,

Thank you for reaching out and sharing your story about your parent’s distressing experience in the Emergency Department (ED) Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital.

Please accept my sincere apologies for the distress and anxiety your parent and family experienced as a result. I recognise how frightening it must have been for your parent to be bought to the hospital by ambulance with chest pain.

I acknowledge patients presenting with chest pain require careful monitoring and supervision even when initial investigations such as an ECG are reassuring.

Your feedback has been shared with Emergency Department leadership so that patient placement, visibility, and observation practices can be reviewed, particularly during busy periods.

I am particularly troubled by your account of your parent being left unattended in the patient toilet and becoming trapped due to a faulty or difficult lock.

This matter has been escalated for immediate review. The condition and function of the toilet locks will be reviewed, and we will reinforce expectations with staff regarding supervision and assistance for patients.

I appreciate you taking the time to recognise the Irish doctor who cared for your parent. I am pleased to hear she made your parent feel heard and supported, and we will make every effort to ensure this feedback is passed on to her and the broader team.

I am truly sorry that, despite the dedication of many of our staff, your overall experience left you feeling that your parent was “just another number.” That is never how we want patients or families to feel. Your feedback is invaluable and will be used to inform improvements.

Thank you again for raising these concerns. I wish your parent continued good health and recovery.

Kind regards

Dr Jodi Graham

Executive Director SCGOPHCG

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k