The Community Midwifery Program is amazing. I recently had a home birth supported by the East Team and cannot sing their praises enough! I wish all women had access to continuity of care no matter what risk profile they have, and the option to home birth if they wanted. The care I received this pregnancy compared to my first where I was in a fragmented care model was exceptional. I was supported in making informed decisions instead of being told it’s time to go do this test now. I felt cared for and valued throughout my care. Please continue to support and expand this program.
Feedback:
I had Pre-labour Rupture of Membranes (PROM) at term for both of my labours. This time I birthed in 17 hours but my first labour was much longer. I’m frustrated that the policy is to have antibiotics at 18 hours to stay at home if not in labour. The Cochrane Review titled ‘Antibiotics for prelabour rupture of membranes at or near term’ states in the conclusion that there is, “no convincing evidence of benefit for mothers or neonates from the routine use of antibiotics for PROM at or near term”. The review recommends that the routine use of antibiotics in the absence of a confirmed infection should be avoided. Why is it that women need to change birth location for declining an intervention that has no evidence I can see to support it? Can this policy please be reviewed?
"Home birth with the Community Midwifery Program"
About: King Edward Memorial Hospital / Community Midwifery Program King Edward Memorial Hospital Community Midwifery Program Subiaco 6008
Posted by woodpigeonre66 (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference
››
Responses
See more responses from Melinda Olive