Text size

Theme

Language

"Amazing day surgery staff"

About: Albany Health Campus / Day Procedure Unit

(as a parent/guardian),

My 7 yr old child had a day surgery procedure today at Albany Health Campus.  We received excellent care and compassion from all the medical and nursing staff, from the admissions clerk, pre-op nurse, anesthetist, surgical team, anaesthetic nurse, post op nurses etc. All my questions were answered clearly and we received clear documentation with post op guidelines. I was very impressed with the service. 

Regarding the admission paperwork, I have some feedback on the readability and ease of completing. As a healthcare worker myself, I was worried I found the paperwork confusing as I am sure many others may also. When contacted to make the operation I was told my child did not require a pre-admission appointment, so when receiving the letter I read the comment 'if you require a pre-admission appointment it will be made for you via the waitlist clerk at the time of booking your procedure.' which confirmed my previous conversation. I almost didn't read on. But when I did, I then had to re-read multiple times the next line which reads 'please contact the above listed anaesthetist as soon as possible to determine whether a pre-anaesthetic appointment is required.'

I almost didn't do this step because in my head 'isnt the pre-admission and pre-anaesthetic the same thing'. I decided to call just to be safe, but was then unsure whether to call the hospital waitlist clerk back or The Surgery where the anaesthetist works as a GP. I figured as a public patient if he's working as an anesthetist for the hospital then the appointment would occur through the hospital. However I rang the GP clinic just to be sure. They were unaware of my child's booked surgery date (10days away) and unsure whether they needed an appointment, but then called me back to say my child did. I was relieved I made the call but concerned I almost didn't. 

I recommend separating the two lines in the letter of operation to make parents realise they are two separate steps. And to clearly say to book the pre-anaesthetic appointment you need to call the surgery directly and not the hospital. 

Then came the separate letter asking us to consider private health insurance to cover the cost of surgery. As a private health member, I am very happy to do this. However the letter advises it's my responsibility to make sure the procedure is covered prior to admission, but no paperwork I received listed the items numbers for the surgery. Lucky I was on holidays and had time to contact Rachael the revenue enhancement officer. She was lovely and able to search for the item numbers and compare this to my health cover. This step again required an extra phone call that I could've easily not bothered to make because the surgery would be free through the public system anyway and the perks of a free newspaper and private room were not appealing to my 7yr old. 

Overall- lovely staff, great hospital and service. However readability and ease of paperwork could be improved to support those with lower health literacy. 

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Kate Hambleton, Director, Albany Health Campus, WACHS GS last month
Kate Hambleton
Director, Albany Health Campus,
WACHS GS
Submitted on 20/08/2026 at 4:42 PM
Published on Care Opinion Australia at 4:52 PM


Dear eridanuswn73,

Thank you for taking the time to share your experience following your child's recent day surgery at Albany Health Campus. We are delighted to hear that you and your child received excellent care and compassion from our admissions, nursing, anaesthetic and surgical teams. It is especially pleasing to know that staff answered your questions clearly and provided helpful information to support your child's recovery. We will be pleased to share your kind feedback with everyone involved in your child's care.

Thank you also for providing such thoughtful and detailed feedback about the admission process and supporting documentation. We appreciate you highlighting areas where the information could be clearer for families. Your comments regarding the distinction between pre-admission and pre-anaesthetic requirements are particularly valuable. We understand how the wording in the correspondence could lead to confusion about whether these are separate steps and who should be contacted to arrange any required pre-anaesthetic assessment. We are grateful that you took the initiative to follow this up, and we recognise your concern that other families may not do the same.

We also appreciate your feedback regarding the private health insurance correspondence. We understand that obtaining procedure item numbers required additional effort and phone calls at a time when families are often focused on preparing for their child's surgery. While we are pleased to hear that our Revenue Enhancement Officer was able to assist you, we acknowledge that the process was not as straightforward as it could have been.

Your comments have been shared with the relevant teams for review. We will use this feedback to examine how our letters and patient information can be improved, particularly around clearly separating pre-admission and pre-anaesthetic requirements, providing clearer instructions about who families should contact, and considering ways to make information regarding private health insurance and procedure item numbers easier to access. Improving the readability and accessibility of our communications is important to us, and your perspective on supporting people with varying levels of health literacy is greatly appreciated.

Thank you again for your kind words about our staff and for taking the time to suggest improvements. Feedback such as yours helps us identify opportunities to enhance the experience of patients and families accessing our services.

We wish your child a smooth recovery and all the very best for the future.

Kind regards

Kate Hambleton

District Director |Lower Great Southern

WACHS Great Southern

9892 2222

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k