This is Care Opinion [siteRegion]. Did you want Care Opinion [usersRegionBasedOnIP]?

"Discharge care"

About: King Edward Memorial Hospital / Maternity

(as the patient),

Parent’s live remotely and mother is type 1 diabetic with pre-eclampsia. Was admitted to KEH for scheduled emergency caesarean. Baby was born early and placed into ICU. Baby was provided excellent assistance by ICU (4 days) and nursery staff. Information and care of baby was well discussed.

This is really about the mother’s care during and after her discharge:

1. Booked in as private patients and were placed in a room with 4 other people.

2. Mother was advised that she would be discharged less than 2 1/2 days after caesarean unless pain was an issue. Parents asked to stay longer, and the staff in the nursery phoned the maternity ward to advise mother not ready to leave hospital and to not discharge yet. When advising staff in the ward during stay and on discharge of excessive pain (not being able to visit our baby in the ICU without a wheelchair due to excessive pain), pain medication was increased and mother was discharged (whilst still in pain), without a wheelchair being provided.

3. The following day, ICU staff advised to go to ED to gain high blood pressure medication due to throbbing headache and feeling faint and very sick. We were made to wait in Emergency for hours (missing critical diabetic meal, and time with baby in ICU) we were finally assessed, and provided high blood pressure medication.

The next day, after having a post-discharge check up with midwife, was advised to go directly to ED due to throbbing headache/high blood pressure and not feeling well. We were made to wait in Emergency for hours (missing critical diabetic meal, and time with baby in ICU) we were finally assessed, medication was increased. Mother spoke with two clinicians regarding confusion of dose prescribed. It seemed one of the clinician’s clarified verbally an incorrect dose (5 x recommended dose). Mother was asking in tablets and the clinician was talking in mg.

Mother went to ED for another script, after 2 days, which was provided without question. Parents went offsite to fill the prescription. Pharmacist questioned the short time for new script, and phoned hospital. Mother went back to hospital and sat in ED for hours again before being seen. Spoke with doctor who clarified dosage and was asked for blood tests due to potential kidney damage due to 5 x dose taken, in line with nurse direction. Mother and baby were both critical.

In our opinion, numerous visits to ED failed to see the critical care required for mother, and really should have been admitted for further care, preventing all of this mismanagement.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Diane Barr, Executive Director, Women and Newborn Health Service, North Metropolitan Health Service nearly 2 years ago
Diane Barr
Executive Director, Women and Newborn Health Service,
North Metropolitan Health Service
Submitted on 2/08/2022 at 4:23 PM
Published on Care Opinion at 4:23 PM


picture of Diane Barr

Dear capellaww69,

Thank you for taking the time to share with me, the recent experience that the family in your post had with the King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEMH). At KEMH, we endeavour to provide our patients with a positive birth experience, including exceptional post-natal care, and I am extremely sorry that this was not the experience of the person you are writing on behalf of.

Undergoing a caesarean section is significant surgery and it is reasonable to expect that care and support would continue to be provided to a patient until they felt well enough to be discharged. KEMH encourages women and their families to advocate for their health and health care, and I am sorry that on this occasion, this patient was discharged from hospital sooner than she would have liked, particularly when their new baby was still in the ICU. I understand that having to return to the Emergency Centre over the following days post-discharge, and waiting for assessment whilst this patient was feeling so unwell would have caused considerable distress, including the anxiety that time spent away from their child in the ICU would have caused. I would like to apologise that this situation occurred.

The events described in your feedback have been taken very seriously, including the information that you have provided about the dosage of the medication prescribed to this patient. I am keen to discuss the events described in your feedback further so that an individualised investigation can be undertaken and a response can be provided to the patient. I would like to encourage this family to contact out Consumer Liaison service on (08) 6458 1444 or via email WNHSCLS@health.wa.gov.au so that this can be undertaken.

Thank you for taking the time to share this experience with me. I wish you and the family all the best for the future.

Your sincerely

Diane Barr

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k