This is Care Opinion [siteRegion]. Did you want Care Opinion [usersRegionBasedOnIP]?

"Failing to acknowledge concerns over spinal issues"

About: Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital / Neurological Intervention and Imaging Service WA

(as the patient),

A few years ago, concerns were raised with a neurologist regarding symptoms that appeared to be spinal in nature. A neurological community nurse at the time sought to raise Autonomic Dysreflexia as a potential condition, as they believed all symptoms matched. 

The neurologist stated as I recalled, that only people in car accidents get spinal cord injuries. Myself and the neuro nurse were, I felt, berated for the concerns we had raised.

I requested for an MRI to be conducted. The MRI was conducted earlier this year. I requested for the MRI report from FOI Officer that same day. I received the MRI report that held clinical findings.

Additionally, I received a letter from the neurologist with their interpretation of the MRI Report that I believe misrepresented the clinical findings as being of no concern and stated that they hope it reassures me.

Upon the next outpatient appointment with the neurologist drawing closer, I contacted the outpatients clinic to refuse to attend the appointment with the neurologist and sought for a review by the head of neurology.

Initially I was informed that this request would only be accepted if it came from a doctor, however, upon further self-advocacy an appointment was set for this month, which has been pushed back to next month.

A few months ago, I would attend ED and be an inpatient in three different private hospitals for complex spinal and pain issues which has resulted in being discharged from a private rehabilitation facility in a powerchair. These issues are believed to have been pre-existing prior to my ED presentation and not due to any acute injury.

In my opinion, it is clear that neurology is incapable of managing my care needs and for the neurology department to remain the lead in my case management would, I believe, leave me at further risk of neglect. I feel neurology have failed to appropriately manage my care since many years ago and this latest issue relating to my spine is, I feel, the pinnacle in a long history of what I believe has been neglect that I feel has resulted in my physically decline into a powerchair.

In my opinion, neurology have sought to protect their department, colleagues and their own professional reputations rather than seeking to resolve any blatant misdiagnosis and mismanagement based on my experience. As a result, I feel any new diagnosis or any new clinical concern raised with their staff will be automatically dismissed, I believe so as to not attract any liability or impression that there may be a degree of incompetency present.

Based on my experience, this creates neglect, as the patient is left without appropriate response to their concerns which has, in my case, resulted in a critical physical decline.

I believe it has also been inappropriate to be managed by a neurologist since some years ago, who specialises in a specific neurological condition, of which I believe I do not have nor show any signs of developing. I feel it is this mismatch in management vs patient needs that I believe has also fostered the neglect.

I feel the most appropriate departments to oversee my care would be:

- Neurosurgery (referral still pending)

- State Spinal Clinic (No referral yet)

- Specialist seating Clinic (No referral yet)

- A particular doctor via Pain Medicine (No referral yet)

- Immunology (Outpatient Appt for next month)

- Any department suitable for gastroparesis, dysphagia, digestive tract low motility management.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Janet Zagari, Executive Director, Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group 2 years ago
Janet Zagari
Executive Director,
Sir Charles Gairdner Osborne Park Health Care Group
Submitted on 26/07/2021 at 10:18 AM
Published on Care Opinion at 10:19 AM


picture of Janet Zagari

Dear SeekingAnswers,

Thank you for your feedback regarding your concerns related to the management of your condition at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (SCGH). I am sorry that you have felt as if you did not receive the care required to manage your complex conditions as it must be very frustrating for you. Care Opinion is an anonymous platform which means that I cannot provide you with a response that answers all the concerns you have raised.

I would encourage you to attend your next appointment with Neurology so that you can discuss the concerns you have about your care and they can work with you on the development of a management plan for your condition. Alternatively, if you do not wish to attend the Neurology appointment, your General Physician (GP) should be able to assist you in progressing with the referrals you require to alternative services.

Once again, my sincere apologies that we have not been able to meet your needs and I hope that moving forward that you will feel that your concerns are being heard.

Kind regards,

Janet Zagari

Executive Director

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful

Update posted by SeekingAnswers (the patient)

Dear Janet

Thank you for your prompt response.

I believe your suggestion of how to move forward is one that I have explored a plethora of times in my eight years of dealing with the neurology department and the public health system in general, as a person living with disabilities, and in my experience, it is not an avenue that produces any tangible outcome. I believe staff are stressed and under time constraints and barely have the interest or scope in my opinion, to discuss the patient's care beyond the standard structure of the consults.

In my experience, this results in a waste of time for both the patient and the doctor, and both parties end up leaving the appointment feeling ongoing frustration and resentment towards the other.

In my opinion, hospital management must begin to take responsibility for ensuring that service delivery does not waste resources or result in poor health outcomes for the patient.


The issue here is, I feel, that there will always be one specialty area that is the "clinical lead" in managing the care of the patient. You can be referred to any other clinic or specialty area. however, based on my experience, they will always seek to liaise with the "clinical lead", in my case being neurology.


However, what happens if neurology has critically failed to manage your care?


What if by liaising with other clinical areas, it is unveiling their own failings?


I think this would be a specialist's nightmare, as nobody wishes to be seen as being incompetent or having made mistakes. So I believe the specialist will do all that they can to save their professional reputation rather than owning up to their errors and reaching out to other clinical areas to assist in ensuring the patient's health outcomes can be salvaged.


This, I believe, is the dilemma.


I could attend the outpatient appointment and have my GP attempt to advance my referrals to other clinical areas but self-advocacy, advocacy of GP and even gaining a consult with specialists from other areas will not, in my opinion, solve this dilemma due to the fact that neurology remains the "clinical lead" in my care. They have, in my opinion, consistently evidenced their inability to act promptly and appropriately to avoid a critical deterioration in my health outcomes.


I have also sought out private neurological input and review however, due to the tertiary hospitals seemingly holding all of the major services/diagnostic equipment etc., there is apparently a limit as to what private neurologists can offer.


I believe it is the culture amongst the neurology department to save face and maintain a degree of authority amongst colleagues that has directly led to my own poor health outcomes.


This is something that neither I nor my GP can change.


This is an internal issue that I believe falls to hospital management to address.


I hope by having my dilemma on this website, it will at least bring to light how our state tertiary hospital could, I believe, be drastically improved to ensure better patient outcomes and clinic efficiency.

Regards,

SeekingAnswers

Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k