This is Care Opinion [siteRegion]. Did you want Care Opinion [usersRegionBasedOnIP]?

"Diagnosed with cancer and then felt forgotten"

About: Fiona Stanley Hospital / Chemotherapy Unit, Cancer Centre, Cancer Outpatients Clinic, Bone Marrow Transplant, Oncology, Radiation Oncology & Ward 7C

(as the patient),

I am a younger adult who has received a life-altering cancer diagnosis which is highly time-sensitive, and Fiona Stanley Hospital has failed to contact me for multiple days in a row with any further information or perform any referrals for Oncology or Haematology.

I had surgery for the removal of a lymph node for biopsy due to a high suspicion of Lymphoma. I have been managed by ENT clinic and whilst my care for the initial surgical care was excellent, I am deeply concerned with the care that I have received since.

During a telephone appointment a week later I was informed that one of my test results available so far was negative for malignancy and that I would be called a few days later with the results of the final test that was still pending, with a formal telehealth appointment also made for the following day for follow-ups.

I did not receive a phone call, despite my calling to follow up and the pathologist having reported on the results of that testing earlier. I only know that I have cancer because I organised for the pathology provider to send a copy of my results to my GP, who was then able to let me know that I had been diagnosed with Nodular Sclerosing Hodgkins Lymphoma.

Despite receiving text confirmation that I had a telehealth appointment on a certain date and time, I did not receive a phone call, and it was only because I contacted the clinic (twice) that I was then notified that the doctor had to attend an emergency and was informed that they would call that afternoon. They did not.

Whilst emergencies can happen, it is deeply concerning that there is no process in place to ensure that patients are informed when delays occur.

When I contacted the clinic in the morning on a different day I was told that they did not realise I hadn’t had my previous appointment, and that I still needed to be contacted.

It is deeply concerning that clinical care is being seemingly missed and that the systems and the people providing that care have no way of monitoring if appropriate care is being provided. If I had not taken the responsibility of following up on Fiona Stanley's failures to communicate, who knows how long it would have taken to realise the error – which could have had profound impacts on my long-term health or I feel may have resulted in my death.

I then received a text message (only after I had called twice and one excellent ENT nurse called their coordinator to follow up) to say that I would be phoned that day by a consultant– They have not called. We were assured they would.

So I have now been missed three times, whilst I have constantly contacted and tried to receive the care that I need to survive, and am entitled to.

If I had not followed up with my GP I still would not know that I have cancer. It concerns me that this means that the specialist who is supposed to be managing my care, reviewing the results and referring me appropriately has possibly not even looked at my results, or begun the appropriate care.

The pathologist reported on and confirmed a diagnosis of Nodular Sclerosing Hodgkin Lymphoma. As per the optimal care pathway for Hodgkins Lymphoma – I believe a referral should have been put through to a specialist within 72 hours, and investigation staging should be completed within 2 weeks of diagnosis. Of great concern is that it has already been several days since the Pathologist provided that diagnosis and it appears the process for referral for investigation and staging has not even begun. At the time of writing this, I feel it is fair to assume that this will not be completed till the following week at the earliest, making it a few more days.

I feel it is very clear that this is also an ongoing issue:

https://www.careopinion.org.au/83711

https://www.careopinion.org.au/93667

https://www.careopinion.org.au/84670

https://www.careopinion.org.au/94759

Fiona Stanley says their hospital vision is “Excellent health care, every time”. Well, I can confidently say that whilst my initial consult, surgery and inpatient stay were all excellent, everything I have experienced post-surgery has been consistently sub-standard, in my opinion, bordering upon totally absent health care.

Fiona Stanley says they strive to be an organisation that demonstrates high performance across all areas – and yet have repeatedly failed to make even a simple phone call to provide a patient with a diagnosis and let them know the ongoing plan.

Fiona Stanley says they value care, and yet this is completely lacking in their interactions with me. I am a younger adult, I have received a life-altering diagnosis of a disease that is time-sensitive in its management, and you don’t even have the basic care to call me and let me know and assure me that I have been appropriately referred for ongoing care. As a younger adult who is still grappling with this diagnosis, I should not have to have had to call seven times in four days and still receive no answers leading into the weekend.

Fiona Stanley says they value integrity, and yet I feel you fail to call me repeatedly after making bookings, assurances and promises to do so.

Fiona Stanley says they value excellence and yet I feel you have failed in almost every aspect of excellence, and you have not even met the minimum standards for safety and quality.

Fiona Stanley says their ambition is a future where you are the public health care service of choice. Well, this is public healthcare so I don’t have a choice, but if I did, based on my experience, it would not be you.

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Neil Doverty, Executive Director Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Hospitals Group, South Metropolitan Health Service 2 months ago
Neil Doverty
Executive Director Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Hospitals Group,
South Metropolitan Health Service
Submitted on 12/02/2024 at 12:30 PM
Published on Care Opinion at 12:30 PM


picture of Neil Doverty

Dear woodpigeonhj53,

Thank you for taking the time to share your story following your recent diagnosis. I can appreciate how desperately worried you must be and I’m sorry that the care and communication you received left you feeling forgotten.

I understand that you were contacted on Thursday 25th of January by the ENT Department with the initial results and were informed that you would be contacted again on Tuesday 30th of January with the next results. I’m sorry that this call did not occur. I have been informed that the doctor who was to call you was required to attend an emergency and was unable to call. This was not communicated to you and for that I apologise.

I am aware that our Duty Medical Director, Dr Dey, contacted you via email on Saturday 3rd of February after you escalated your concerns via a hospital feedback email on Friday 2nd February. Dr Dey acknowledged your complaint and committed to follow up with his senior clinical colleagues on the morning of Monday 5th February.

Dr Dey confirmed that you were independently contacted by our ENT department on Sunday 4th of February who were aware of your diagnosis, discussed with you your results and informed you of your referral to the Haematology team. As indicated in his contact with you on Saturday 3rd February, Dr Dey followed up with the Haematology team on Monday 5th February, who confirmed that they had received the referral from ENT department. I was relieved to learn that you attended your appointment the following day.

Your story is a powerful reminder of the stress and anxiety a life changing diagnosis can have on our patients, and the importance of ensuring they are kept informed along their journey.

I wish you well going forward and during your planned treatment.

Kind regards

Neil Doverty

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful

Update posted by woodpigeonhj53 (the patient)

Neil,

I appreciate your concern, and also the follow-up that Dr. Dey provided and the Haematology team who have provided excellent care moving forward.

My concern however has less to do with my treatment and more to do with the fact that I feel this is clearly a systemic issue that is not being addressed and which I believe may be doing many of your patients a disservice or risking their health.

The concerns are threefold:

1) As stated above, there were three times I was told a doctor would call, two of which were texted to me as appointments, on the 30th Jan, 1st and 2nd Feb (the third of which was meant to be with a consultant), none of which followed through. There was no communication of a delay, or change in appointment time, and there was nothing in place in the system to inform staff to call me the next day meaning my appointment was simply forgotten, and probably I believe others too.

2) As in details communicated to Dr. Dey and patient liaison there appears to have been some restructuring that happened within the ENT department several months ago which is a concern to many of the junior registrars, meaning multiple patients may not be receiving their results at all or in a timely fashion. It seems to me that here lies an opportunity for improvement.

3) Whilst things have proceeded quickly since escalation to the executive team, it should not require an executive of the hospital to have to complete a simple results review and referral, for what in my case is a reasonably common cancer.

My health issues are not the primary concern here, other than to objectively state that the lack of communication adds unnecessary distress. If I had been someone with limited English, with more severely debilitating symptoms, or with no knowledge at all of the medical system then this situation would have been worse and may have led to far more severe consequences than I am likely to suffer.

As emailed to the patient liaison team and several of the executive team, I feel a proper conclusion to this matter would include a response as to how the system will be examined and improved moving forward, particularly within the ENT department, so that it doesn't risk the health and welfare of multiple patients, not to mention add additional pressure to your junior doctors trying their best to work in what I feel is a broken system.

Thanks

Response from Neil Doverty, Executive Director Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Hospitals Group, South Metropolitan Health Service 2 months ago
We have made a change
Neil Doverty
Executive Director Fiona Stanley and Fremantle Hospitals Group,
South Metropolitan Health Service
Submitted on 14/02/2024 at 4:19 PM
Published on Care Opinion at 4:40 PM


picture of Neil Doverty

Dear woodpigeonhj53

With increasing service demand, it has become more difficult for the ENT Registrars to manage the virtual clinic priorities and other on-call clinical duties simultaneously. Whilst we had recently became aware of this pressure, and were considering the best service changes, your experience and feedback has served to highlight this issue and need for change. A decision has been made to remove these virtual clinic duties from the on-call Registrar role and to incorporate them into other dedicated ENT clinics where the staff have less issue with potentially competing and urgent tasks. We expect this will make an experience such as yours much less likely.

I am very glad to hear you are happy with the excellent care you are receiving from Haematology.

At a time that is no doubt very stressful for you, I would like to sincerely thank you for your feedback that has accelerated a change to our system.

Once again, we wish you the very best for your ongoing treatment and recovery.

Kind regards

Neil Doverty

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful

Update posted by woodpigeonhj53 (the patient)

Thank you for your response, I think this change sounds very promising.

Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k